In response to: The Design of Reiser4
Comment from: vato Member

Niltze [Hello], Jordi-
We do appreciate your insightful comment and suggestions. It has been forwarded and shared verbatim to relevant parties for consideration into their efforts when planning a roadmap ahead.
Notwithstanding, there are no assurances that reiser4 development will continue (we are already one kernel major version behind for Debian Amatlocuilin, i.e., ‘Bookworm’) as we recently deduced – by his indoctus and self serving, victim-playing, rant, nonetheless – that there was never a good faith intention by the principal Linux source maintainer to merge this superb file system into his kernel source tree. It is just another instance of ideology, the West’s inherent biases, and politics, clobbering technical meritocracy – as it was pointed out in an older post: Coyolxauhqui: Build Reiser4 -patched Linux Kernel, Headers, and Modules, for Stretch-Backports the ‘Debian Way‘ when dealing with the schizophrenic Red Hat employee/maintainer’s rejection of a reiser4 patch for GNU Parted. That is, we have always gone against all odds. Well, it is what it is.
Again, Jordi, thank you for your efforts in contacting us.
Best Professional Regards.
Latest Comments