Metztli I. T.  Blog

I recently attended IBM Rational 5th Anniversary Celebration held at the IBM CodeStation on the Second Life virtual world. Needless to say, the experience represented a fascinating glimpse into what may be the future of enterprise social networking and business collaboration--as suggested by IBM Lotus Connections, Quickr, Lotus Foundations and Bluehouse.

Second Life and the need for proprietary video drivers for Linux.

At Metztli IT we “eat our own cooking.” We not only recommend Linux for its stability, security, open standards, and cost effectiveness, but we live and breathe Linux, OS/2, and Solaris. Given the fact that virtually there are no open source 3D accelerated video drivers for ATI and NVIDIA video cards, it is necessary to download an closed source ATI and/or NVIDIA video driver a priori to engaging into the Second Life experience. It is a resource intensive environment; notwithstanding, recent hardware like AMD Spider should be more than adequate.


Novell's SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) will automate the installation of proprietary video drivers into Linux during the SLED installation. On the other hand, Canonical supported Debian-based Ubuntu versions will do likewise –as well as other Linux distributions like Mandriva¹. However, if a manual installation is desired, especially if a video card upgrade will be performed into a potentially different PCI slot under Linux, use the command lspci (i.e., list the PCI divices) to locate the possible new location of your video card; do not forget to convert the hexadecimal string into its decimal equivalent when you modify your XF86Config or xorg.conf X-window configuration file.

As an specific example, typing (as root or super user) the command lspci at a shell prompt on a given machine will return (one of) the following hex string in the line of output (among other lines):

00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ...(video card info)

Accordingly, in the Device section of your XF86Config and or xorg.conf enter the above specific entry for the PCI slot where your card resides. It should be converted from hex into decimal base. That is, the first two zeroes are maped into a single 0, followed by the colon. Subsequently, the hex 12 converted into decimal base is an 18, and another colon follows; and lastly the dot (.) is replaced by another colon field separator, followed by the last zero. Accordingly, the BusID is expressed within quotations as illustrated in the example below:

Code

Second Life client software for Linux is in alpha stage.

Second Life client software for Linux is available in a compressed format that an user may simply select by clicking on the downloaded file; subsequently the Linux Gnome, KDE, or other window managers will decompress into the user's choice of location in the file system.

Alternatively, an user may simply move the Second Life compressed client software to where s/he will install and subsequently type at her/his Linux shell:

bzip2 -d <Second_Life-download>.tar.bz2

where the option -d is to decompress and the text string inside angled brackets(inclusive) is replaced by the actual version of the Second Life client software available. There will remain an file of the form:

<Second_Life-downlaod>.tar

that should be subsequently expanded with the command:

tar -xvpPf <Second_Life-download>.tar

will extract the contents of the encapsulated file and provide verbose output to the screen; it will create a directory of the Second Life Linux alpha client of the name (as of 02-21-2008):

SecondLife_i686_1_18_5_3

Changing directory into that location,

cd SecondLife_i686_1_18_5_3

and typing at the command shell to start the alpha client:

./secondlife

will create a window prompting for relevant user information before logging into the Second Life virtual world, in my specific case the IBM CodeStation.

Let me remark that my Second Life character, being my first incursion into the promising future of enterprise collaboration environments, is not as defined as those of other inhabitants of the virtual world. Notwitstanding, I managed to accept an VIP invitation from a member of the IBM maintanance crew who probably was wodering what I was doing so early there. Later, at the time of IBM Rational 5th Anniversary, notwithstanding, the online presence of other virtual attendees was evident:

Some of the attendees had what appeared to be orange juice to "drink." Although I was provided an celebration kit, at the time I was unaware that I had been enabled to celebrate with a "drink":

The nature of the IBM Rational celebration implied technology savvy individuals among the early audience, like the IBM Rational developers who create the IBM CodeStation infrastructure. Those developers even created sparking lights that some held in that enterprise collaboration environment --without worries that those sparks would end in a short time, like those do due to the constrains in our physical world.

Metztli Information Technology, following the lead of IBM into the future of enterprise collaboration and social networking with technologies like BlueGrass and the Jazz Project is ready to enable the small and medium business (SMB ), as well as large enterprises --by leveraging our partnership with IBM-- to meet the future confidently. Think ...Metztli = Moon ~ Innovation.

---

¹Thanks for prodding me to correct broken link! Nevertheless, for security I will not publish any short URLs.

NOTE: suggestion code for XF86Config and xorg.conf as well as commands entered at the Linux shell(s) prompt are provided on an as-is basis. Although due diligence has been applied, the information may not be accurate under all circumstances. Accordingly, please do not hold Metztli IT responsible if unforseen effects are experienced. You are not obliged to use the information provided.

Internal CEO over External. All the academic studies agree that an internal CEO is a less risky proposition than an external one. However, an external CEO is needed when the organization needs a dramatic shift. You both were more than justified to make that shift 5 years ago when you brought in Terry. The environment is different today. A respected internal leader would be embraced and rallied around by the Yahoo!s. You have the perfect candidate within your midst.
An Open Letter to Jerry Yang and David Filo. 11/17/2006 blog

Apparently Yahoo! followed many of the recommendations carefully detailed in that blog. From a business perspective, the advice apparently made sense; notwithstanding, the biggest flaw in the recommended path is now evident: an external captain for Yahoo! was needed --not an internal "well respected" but inexperienced one. And now Microsoft wants to own Yahoo!

Having realized late (due to an antiquated pre-Internet business model) that the Network is the computer --that is, the level (enabled by the Internet) at which computing processes occur-- MS recent hostile intention to take over Yahoo! should not be taken with indifference.

The Internet is open to innovation, collaboration, and competition, because the protocols to exchange information are open like TCP/IP, simple like HTTP, and freely available to any entity technically proficient to implement those.

Those notions of openness are alien to Microsoft because its control of the markets that it dominates is due to the encroaching principles inherent in its proprietary (hence hidden source) operating systems, communication protocols, and certain file systems, among a long list. It is therefore not surprising that those of us in the free and open source software side have to struggle to integrate our open technology offerings with Microsoft's closed source proprietary technology.

This modus operandi, typical of monopolistic entities, has been practiced by MS to limit competitors's access --notably free and open source entities like us, to a fair opportunity to compete by offering alternative excellent and robust open standards technology solutions. From the open source side, for example, until recently and only due to an European Union mandate, we were unable to know the communication protocol used by certain types of Microsoft technology --hence we experienced integration issues with MS applications that communicated by means of the SMB protocol.

Accordingly, allowing Microsoft to acquire Yahoo! would seriously undermine the openness with which free and open source software entities like us, as well as Microsoft's proprietary competitors, have access to services and collaborate in the Internet cloud platform.

Collaboration and social networking engagements through the medium of the Internet have up to now been open to heterogeneous devices, like personal computers and handheld alternatives; and mail and messenger protocols have been open; non-Microsoft operating systems, like Linux/freeBSD/Unix and OS/2, as well as non-Microsoft browser software applications like Mozilla and Firefox, empower users to access the Internet for collaboration and social networking with freedom.

But if more power over any aspect of the Internet is granted to Microsoft, that entity will likely attempt to usurp Yahoo!'s quasi and open source software infrastructure (Zimbra, for instance) in favour of its proprietary, closed-source protocols and software. Microsoft has done that in the past, during the initial business and customer technological phase of evolution --prior to the full realization of the "Internet is the computer paradigm."

Those of us in the free and open source side want to have an equal access to communicate, collaborate, and engage in business in that vast and rich Internet landscape. Allowing Microsoft more influence in the network of networks --the Internet-- by the acquisition of Yahoo! will potentially defeat the implicit principle of open access to the Internet to future generations.

Therefore, us at Metztli Information Technology, believe that allowing Microsoft to take over Yahoo! is counterproductive to the Internet as a whole. Unfettered and quality access to the Internet and its content in the future might potentially be restricted to only those individuals or entities that use Microsoft software and/or services, and/or pay royalties. Evidently, we do not think Microsoft's acquisition attempt is only about the added revenue of online advertising market share. We think it is about the invasion and monopolization of the Internet computing platform.