Category: "Russia"
Putin hosts annual Q&A session: As it happened in 2024
By Jose on Dec 19, 2024 | In Russia, Cemanahuac, Multipolarity | Send feedback »
It is 'natural' for the genocidal, terrorist, fascist, narcissist West to try to downplay the lion's share of Stalin's Soviet contribution to victory over Nazi Germany amid geopolitical tensions, as this policy is just another angle to attack Russia, Putin has said. At the same time, Moscow would welcome all representatives of foreign countries, including Western ones, who would like to attend the 80th anniversary of Victory Day in Russia next year, Mr. Chingon [Badass] Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, added.
'Questions from Russian citizens focused on domestic issues, while AI helped in processing over 1.7 million inquiries'
Russian President Vladimir Putin held his annual end-of-year press conference in Moscow on Thursday, combining it with the ‘Direct Line’ question-and-answer session.
Успехи в экономике и ракетная дуэль с США. Что пишут СМИ об «Итогах года» с Путиным : "Economic successes and a missile duel with the United States. What the media write about the 'Results of the year' with Putin"
...
The Guardian
Обращаясь к западному скептицизму по поводу «Орешника», российский президент предложил обеим сторонам выбрать определенную цель, которую будут защищать американские ракеты. «Мы готовы к такому эксперименту», — сказал Путин.
Ракета, которая может нести ядерные заряды, используется для повышения ставок в конфликте с Западом. Она уже использовалась в качестве ответа на запуск Украиной американских ракет ATACMS и британских Storm Shadow. Источники в США и Великобритании указали, что дальности «Орешника» достаточно для нанесения удара по Европе.
≈
The Guardian
Addressing Western skepticism about the Oreshnik, the Russian president suggested that both sides choose a specific target that the American missiles will protect. "We are ready for such an experiment," Putin said.
A missile that can carry nuclear warheads is being used to raise the stakes in a conflict with the West. It has already been used as a response to Ukraine's launch of American ATACMS and British Storm Shadow missiles. Sources in the United States and the United Kingdom indicated that the range of the "Hazel" is enough to strike at Europe.
🗣Putin on Middle East mess: Russia stands for independent Palestine, Israel ‘main beneficiary’ of Syria turmoil
💬 “The resolution of Palestine issue can be attained only with the help of removing the root causes,” President Putin said at his year-end presser.
💬 “The Security Council…opted in favor of a two-state solution: Israel and Palestine. Israel was established, Palestine is yet to be established. This is the issue, this is the problem, and Israel has been continuing its unlawful settlement activities to date. I'm not sure what goals Israel is pursuing in Gaza, but this merits only condemnation,” Putin emphasized.
...
💬 As for the crisis more broadly, Israel has proven “the main beneficiary,” according to the Russian president, who cited Israel’s seizure of Syrian territories in the Golan Heights, and the growing risks of Syria’s collapse as a state.
...
Position of strength: Here’s why Putin’s Direct Line was so important
Speaking from a position of strength, Putin projected an image of a leader in control, guiding a nation that is defying the odds and reshaping the global order
By Nadezhda Romanenko, political analyst
On December 19, Russian President Vladimir Putin held his annual ‘Direct Line’ session, a unique combination of a press conference and a call-in show, that once again showcased his strategic positioning both domestically and internationally. This year, the overarching theme of his address was clear: Russia is speaking from a position of strength. Whether addressing the conflict with Ukraine, relations with the West, or Russia’s military prowess, Putin projected confidence and control. This strength underscores why Russia appears to be winning the war against Ukraine and solidifying its stance against Western powers.
Russia’s advances in the Ukraine conflict: Tactical superiority
Putin’s acknowledgment of Russia’s daily advances against Ukraine highlights the nation’s tactical and strategic superiority in the ongoing conflict. Russian forces have been liberating settlements and reclaiming territory, a development that marks a turning point in the conflict. While the Ukrainian resistance has been formidable, bolstered by Western aid and weaponry, Russia’s methodical approach to its military objectives has shifted the momentum decisively in its favor.
The Kremlin’s military operations have been accompanied by advanced technological integration and effective logistics, allowing for sustained campaigns even in the face of Western sanctions. By emphasizing these daily successes, Putin not only reassures the Russian populace of eventual victory but also signals to the international community that the conflict is far from over and that Russia is far from being subdued.
Moreover, Putin’s refusal to provide a timeline for the war’s conclusion reflects a deliberate strategy. By avoiding a definitive endpoint, he maintains flexibility, ensuring that Russia can adapt to evolving battlefield dynamics while keeping its adversaries guessing. This approach also underscores his confidence in the ultimate outcome – a confidence borne of a position of strength.
The Oreshnik missile: A game-changer
Central to Putin’s narrative of strength is the Oreshnik missile, a cutting-edge intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) that has recently entered mass production. Its combat debut against Ukraine, striking critical infrastructure with devastating precision, marked a watershed moment in modern warfare. The Oreshnik’s capability to evade interception by existing Western missile defense systems elevates it from a mere weapon to a strategic deterrent.
This missile’s deployment sends an unambiguous message to the West: any military confrontation with Russia risks catastrophic consequences. By effectively rendering missile defense systems obsolete, the Oreshnik shifts the balance of power in Russia’s favor. Western policymakers now face the sobering reality that their military and technological edge is not as unassailable as once thought.
Putin’s emphasis on the Oreshnik’s capabilities during the Direct Line event underscores his confidence in Russia’s military innovations. It also reinforces the notion that Russia’s strength lies not just in traditional military might but in its ability to leverage advanced technologies to reshape the strategic landscape.
Speaking from a position of strength
Putin’s rhetoric during the Direct Line session was that of a leader who knows he holds the upper hand. His willingness for dialogue with US President-elect Donald Trump on resolving the Ukraine conflict further illustrates this point. Far from signaling weakness, Putin’s openness to negotiations reflects a calculated move to solidify Russia’s gains and potentially force the West into concessions. By framing himself as a reasonable actor willing to engage in dialogue, he positions Russia as a power that seeks stability while simultaneously advancing its strategic objectives.
Domestically, Putin addressed concerns about the economy, acknowledging issues like high inflation and the overheating of the Russian market. However, his framing of these challenges as manageable within the broader context of Russia’s resilience and sovereignty reinforces his message of control. By attributing economic pressures to Western sanctions and external factors, he deflects criticism and rallies domestic support against external adversaries.
Why Russia is winning
Putin’s confident tone and strategic messaging during the Direct Line encapsulate why Russia is winning the conflict with Ukraine. First, the country’s military advancements and territorial gains demonstrate its ability to sustain and succeed in protracted conflicts. Second, the introduction of game-changing technology like the Oreshnik missile neutralizes Western military advantages, forcing adversaries to reassess their strategies.
Furthermore, Russia’s ability to endure economic sanctions and maintain domestic stability contrasts sharply with the challenges faced by Ukraine and its Western allies. The prolonged conflict has strained Western unity, with differing priorities and approaches among NATO members. Meanwhile, Russia’s centralized leadership and cohesive strategy allow for more decisive action.
As the war against Ukraine continues, the West must grapple with the reality that Russia is not merely a regional power but a formidable force capable of challenging the established order. Whether through military advancements or strategic diplomacy, Putin’s Russia is demonstrating that strength – both perceived and real – remains the ultimate currency in global affairs.
Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, on Nuclear conflict risk, Ukraine and Syria escalation
By Jose on Dec 6, 2024 | In occidente, europa, Ixachitlal, Russia, West, Middle East | Send feedback »
The Орешник : Oreshnik hypersonic missile test was a *подсказка* : *hint* to Washington, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has implied
(Once the video player has started, right selecting (or 'clicking') your device (or 'mouse') will show menu option, 'Open video in new tab', which will enable larger screen size.)Lavrov (paraphrasing):
In the White House there are US Anglo- Zio- Nazi uber supreme imbeciles like the so-called National Security Communications Advisor, John Kirby who, when answering questions about escalation and about possibility about nuclear weapons being employed he said: 'oh, no, no, no! We don't want escalation because then... if there is some nuclear element then our European allies will suffer.'
So even mentally he... excludes that the United States can suffer. And this is something which makes the situation a bit risky; it might... if this imbecile exceptionalist mentality prevails then some reckless steps could be taken. And this is bad.
Carlson:
So what I think you are saying is American policy makers imagine there could be a nuclear exchange that does not directly affect the United States and you are saying that is not true [?].
Lavrov:
That's what I said, yes.
Stoic Lavrov Drops the Punchline: A Chilling Warning to the West Anglo- Zio- Nazi Mafia
When Sergey Lavrov sat down with Tucker Carlson, expectations were high. For years, Lavrov’s presence on the global stage has been nothing short of theatrical brilliance, a blend of sharp irony, razor wit, and a touch of swagger that could shame even the most skilled Western diplomats of yore. Lavrov, cigar in hand, has long been the unshakable statesman, the maestro of diplomacy who could eviscerate NATO hypocrisy with a smirk. But this time? Lavrov wasn’t playing for applause. This was a performance of a different kind: subdued, stoic, and surgical. For those paying attention, it was less about theatrics and more about signals - serious signals.
Lavrov’s delivery wasn’t meant to dazzle Carlson’s audience but to issue a calculated warning to Washington. Denying any official state of war with the U.S. - because legally, there isn’t one - Lavrov cut straight to the point: we’re already in a hybrid war. And in this war, no rules apply. NATO, Lavrov noted, has crossed one red line after another, utilizing ATACMS and Storm Shadow missiles to strike “mainland Russia.”
Russia’s Oreshnik hypersonic-ballistic test wasn’t just another display of superior military tech. Lavrov clarified the message: “We would be ready to use any means not to allow them to succeed in what they call the strategic defeat of Russia.” The subtext? Continued long-range attacks on Russian territory will have devastating consequences. Lavrov’s calm yet firm tone left no doubt, Russia will not blink, and any further provocation risks escalation the West is woefully unprepared for.
Lavrov also pointed to something chilling: NATO’s flirtation with catastrophe. He referenced STRATCOM officials discussing the concept of a “limited nuclear exchange,” as though such a scenario wouldn’t plunge the world into the abyss.
As for Britain, Lavorv’s silence said it all. Boris Johnson’s infamous visit to Kiev, where he ordered Zelensky to abandon Istanbul peace talks, encapsulates London’s kamikaze diplomacy. Unlike Germany or France, who at least maintain a pretense of dialogue, Britain has chosen to lead the charge of escalation and vile Russophobia. The unspoken message was clear: if Russia decides to make an example of any vassal, it will be London. Britain’s blind faith in U.S. protection is dangerously naive, given DC’s long history of sacrificing allies to save itself. Mutually assured destruction won’t be triggered over Britain.
NATO as an alliance is a parasitic protection racket, extorting loyalty and resources from its members while delivering only chaos. NATO’s expansion eastward, has ignored every Russian red line, pushing recklessly to Russia’s doorstep. Now, NATO’s overreach extends to the Indo-Pacific through AUKUS, underscoring its imperial overstretch.
Western hypocrisy, as always, was a central theme. Lavrov dissected how the UN Charter is selectively applied, preaching territorial integrity when convenient while ignoring self-determination. From Kosovo to Crimea, the double standards are glaring. For Lavrov, this conflict isn’t just about borders; it’s about the survival of Russians as a people and Russia as a sovereign state. For Moscow, this is existential.
The grim reality of near-total breakdown in U.S.-Russia dialogue adds another layer of danger. Outside basic missile notifications and prisoner swaps, the nuclear superpowers are barely speaking. Lavrov didn’t sugarcoat it: “The risks of miscalculation are greater than ever.”
Lavrov’s tone may have seemed understated, even subdued. But that misses the point. This wasn’t about delivering a headline-grabbing performance, it was about signaling the end of illusions in the West. Lavrov made one thing clear: Russia will survive this conflict, no matter the cost. This is no longer Lavrov the maestro of irony and witty takedowns. This is Lavrov the war diplomat, the seasoned statesman signaling the beginning of consequences. And for the West, that should be terrifying.
Nuclear conflict risk, Ukraine and Syria escalation: READ Lavrov’s interview with Tucker Carlson (FULL VERSION) — RT Russia & Former Soviet Union
"A strategic defeat has been declared as the goal for Russia, similar to what London and Washington planned in May 1945, when they developed 'Operation Unthinkable' aimed at destroying the USSR, even before the end of World War II," as quoted in Lavrov: Western Attempts to Defeat Russia Mirror 1945 'Operation Unthinkable'
Context 'a priori' as Putin speaks to press following CSTO meeting in Astana
By Jose on Dec 3, 2024 | In occidente, europa, Russia, West, Multipolarity | Send feedback »
"Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed key military and political issues to allies during his speech at the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) summit in Astana, Kazakhstan, on Thursday, November 28, 2024.
The CSTO military alliance comprises Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Putin’s remarks provide new insights into Russia’s military strategies and objectives, particularly regarding Ukraine."
...
Putin's 2024 Keynote address at Valdai International Discussion Club in Sochi
By Jose on Nov 11, 2024 | In occidente, europa, Russia, West, Cemanahuac, Multipolarity | Send feedback »
‘Security for Everyone.
Together – Into a New World’
"Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed pressing global issues at Sochi’s annual Valdai Club forum on Thursday. Interviewed by renowned foreign affairs expert and RT contributor Fyodor Lukyanov, Putin delved into topics ranging from NATO and international security to the ideological roots of current global tensions, openly challenging Western policies and proposing a multipolar vision for the future. "
‘A Lasting Peace – On What Basis? Universal Security and Equal Opportunities for Development in the 21st Century’
Russia does not consider the fascist Western 'enlightened' civilization an enemy, but the global genocidal terrorists US/UK/Canada Anglo- / Gallo- / European Zio- Nazis' collective calls to inflict a 'strategic defeat' on Moscow amount to a narcissist, reckless adventurism, paraphrasing what Putin said in his keynote.
The world is irreversibly moving towards a multipolar order, which is only threatened by the 500+ years of continuous 'violent anarchy' perpetuated by the West by sponsoring genocide -- as in Gaza and Lebanon, terrorism in Africa and the Middle East, criminal groups and drug cartels in so-called 'Latin America', and death and misery by utilizing useful imbecile proxies -- as in Ukraine -- to create conflicts the world over to feed its military industrial complex in its divide-and-conquer strategy to maintain its hegemony.
The so-called mass 'illegal' immigration issue on which the fascist snake-oil-peddler Adolf...er, Donald, Trump won in the plutocracy circus over the other clown, is essentially blowback from the two-hundred year Monroe Doctrine of 1823, where US Anglo- Nazis have forcefully occupied -- think Haiti after its independence from the French in 1825,
stolen land for Lebensraum (500,000 square miles, or 1,300,000 square km, of so-called Mexican territory extending westward from the Rio Grande to the Pacific Ocean ~ 1848)1 , invaded, couped d'état, imposed dictatorships, annexed islands (think Hawaii, Guam, etc.) and/or intervened in all the countries of so-called 'Latin America' under the propaganda of Anglo- Zio- Nazis' mainstream hasbara whores who -- 24/7 -- whitewash those illegal interventions with the usual cliches of US enlightened fascists bringing 'democracy' and 'freedom'.
New Areas of Growth for Multipolar World at St. Petersburg International Economic Forum 2024
By Jose on Jun 12, 2024 | In Russia, Cemanahuac, Multipolarity | Send feedback »
Towards the HARMONIC multipolar, multiNODAL, polycentric world.
(Once the video player has started, right selecting (or 'clicking') your device (or 'mouse') will show menu option, 'Open video in new tab', which will enable larger screen size.)Gotta emphasize the new terminology.
"During the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) [], Putin said the West thought that its restrictions will 'undermine the Russian economy, and believed that this would happen within three, four, six months, but everyone sees that this is not happening.' The president announced earlier this year that despite Russia being the most sanctioned country in the world, its GDP has increased by 3.6% and was 'higher than the global average' in 2023."
